Showing posts with label United States. Show all posts
Showing posts with label United States. Show all posts

Tuesday, November 23, 2010

BODY SCANNER OPERATOR CAUGHT MASTURBATING AT COLARADO AIRPORT

August 4th, 2010 by Hugh Muzzbe
Not only do the new airport body scanners take risque pictures but according to the U.S. Marshals Service, the images in their thousands are being saved on hard disks.
DENVER - USA - A full body scanner operator was caught masturbating during a scanning session by airport staff late Tuesday.


Airport officials at Denver International airport were on high alert yesterday when a full body scanner operator was caught masturbating in his booth as a team of High School netball players went through the scanner.

"The young ladies were going through the scanner one by one, and every time one went through, this guys face was getting redder and redder. His hand was moving and then he started sweating. He was then seen doing his 'O' face. That's when the security dragged him out of his booth and cuffed him. He had his pants round his ankles and everybody was really disgusted," Jeb Rather, a passenger on a flight to New York told CBS news.

The controversial scanners display every minute detail of a person's body and have been called intrusive by privacy campaigners. Body scanners penetrate clothing to provide a highly detailed image so accurate that critics have likened it to a virtual porn shoot. Technologies vary, with millimeter wave systems capturing highly detailed pictures of genitals, and backscatter X-ray machines able to show precise anatomical detail. The U.S. government likes the idea because body scanners can detect concealed weapons better than traditional magnetometers.

"What do you want to do, get blown up by a goddamn Arab at 30,000 feet or we get to see your private parts? It's up to you, the ball's in your park," head of the TSA's scanning department, Rodney Schroeder, told CNN.

Sunday, September 19, 2010

US SOLDIERS 'KILLED AFGHANS FOR SPORT'

September 19, 2010 - 4:24PM

A group of US soldiers is facing accusations of randomly targetting and killing Afghan civilians for sport, The Washington Post has reported.

The incidents involved rogue members of a platoon from the 5th Stryker Combat Brigade, 2nd Infantry Division, the newspaper said on Sunday, citing army legal documents and interviews with people involved in the case.

The soldiers' game started last northern winter, when an Afghan man approached a US trooper in the village of La Mohammed Kalay, the report said.

As the man neared, one soldier created a ruse that he and his men were under attack, then tossed a fragmentary grenade on the ground, the paper noted.

Then the other soldiers opened fire, killing the man.

According to The Post, the unprovoked attack on January 15 was the start of a months-long shooting spree against civilians that resulted in some of the grisliest allegations against American soldiers since the US invasion of Afghanistan in 2001.

Members of the platoon have been charged with dismembering and photographing corpses, as well as hoarding a skull and other human bones, the report said.

The father of one soldier said he repeatedly tried to alert the army after his son told him about the first killing, only to be rebuffed, The Post said.

Military documents allege that five members of the unit staged a total of three murders in Kandahar province between January and May, the paper noted.

Seven other soldiers have been charged with crimes related to the case, including hashish use, attempts to impede the investigation and a retaliatory gang assault on a private who blew the whistle, according to The Post.

Army officials have not disclosed a motive for the killings, the report noted.

But a review of military court documents and interviews with people familiar with the investigation suggest the killings were committed essentially for sport by soldiers who had a fondness for hashish and alcohol, The Post said.

The accused soldiers deny wrongdoing, the paper noted.

AFP

This story was found at: http://www.theage.com.au/world/us-soldiers-killed-afghans-for-sport-20100919-15hpd.html

Saturday, September 18, 2010

VOTE ALL YOU WANT…THE AGENDA DOESN’T CHANGE

September 17, 2010 by ppjg

Marti Oakley (c)copyright 2010 All Rights Reserved

_________________________________________

We vote because we believe it will make a difference. We vote because we have been carefully steered through fictional ideologies, presented to us as “us against them”, the right v left, Democrat v Republican, liberal v conservative. It is all a ruse. Not one of the people who wave the party flags, who promote the party platforms on either side of the fictional isle belong to anything other than the ruling party of the District of Criminals. This one party system which has a death grip on the country isn’t about to let go; but I’m not voting for any of them. I’ve decided that I will not vote for the candidate most likely to cause the least destruction just because he or she isn’t quite as corrupted as the pretended opposition.

We have choices between two things….rotten, and not so rotten at the moment. If those are the only choices I have, I refuse to choose. I refuse to be forced to choose between the lesser of two evils. Evil is evil; changing the face of evil by rotating which faction is center stage, makes it no less malignant. I will not be forced to vote for candidates I firmly believe are set against us.

We need the choice of voting “no confidence” on our ballots. We need to be able to prevent anyone who cannot garner at least 50% of the vote, from taking an official office. We need to end corrupt politicians sitting in office who got only 20 or 30% of the vote. We need a means to convey our disgust at the lack of honesty, integrity and moral character that a vote of “no confidence” could provide. And we need to prevent career politicians from nesting up in government on a minimal number of votes.

Regardless of which camp you like to think you are in, voting will simply deliver you more of the same no matter who wins. Just as the Democrats picked up where the Republicans left off in 2008, the changing of the guard on congress will simply see a continuance of the agenda already in motion. The Republicans will simply pick up where the Democrats left off. But you are supposed to believe there is some great and vast difference between the right and left. We’ll get rid of those nasty Democrats and put the Republicans back in there running things…..yeah….that’ll fix it. Wait…Weren’t the Republicans the ones who set this mess up during Bush the Lessor’s tenure as Prez? And, weren’t the Democrats going to ride in to save us from the nasty Republicans?

What changed? Not a thing; and nothing will change after the November election regardless of who controls the House or Senate. Just as the Democrats swore they would repeal the anti-American Patriot Acts, which helped them win in 2008, and who then went on to expand and extend the Acts, Republicans are now promising to repeal Obamacare. And, just as in 2008, this election, should it go to the Republicans, will see the implementation and expansion of Obamacare under their watch. There is no intention to repeal or change anything.

While voting gives us a feeling of empowerment, and makes us feel like we actually have a voice in our own government, the truth is they don’t give a damn what we think, say or believe. We are simply helping decide who will wield the club we will be beaten with this time around. I have absolutely no faith in, no trust of, either Republicans or Democrats.

It almost looked like change

I actually had great hopes for the Tea Party movement in the beginning. Even as the primaries have shown some really stunning upsets for the “Republican” faction, any hopes I had for what was an across the board grassroots movement that encompassed even former life-long Democrats such as myself, has been co-opted by the like of Sarah Palin and Glenn Beck. What could have been a day of reckoning for politics in the US was of course, reduced to a side show complete with clowns, buffoons, and bad actors. With few exceptions, (and there are a few) those who won primary’s representing the Tea Party movement, have seen the best of their success.

Palin and Beck, in their own way, are symbolic of what is wrong with American’s and by extension, what is wrong with the political system. When two rubes such as these two, can con the public into thinking and believing that anything they say is worth listening to, I believe it is indicative of lowered overall intelligence sprinkled with a healthy dose of religious zealotry; the perfect combination for the audience of a snake oil salesmen.

While I agree that Palin is a very attractive woman, I also know she doesn’t have clue as to what the words she has been so carefully coached to say, mean. It doesn’t matter; she laces all her speeches with references to God, prayer, the bible, and homespun earthiness sure to dupe even the most disinterested listener. As for Beck,….I cannot get past the “Vick’s” thing. I found him dishonest to begin with, even with all his “founding fathers”, the “commies v God” stuff; but the Vicks was just too much. What a dork.

On the left, they are unable to even get a road show going, although I do believe one more episode of the over-articulated and scary Nancy Pelosi, will probably give me regular nightmares. Her counter-part, Harry Reid is far too controlled, too calculating and deceptive. These two are perfect examples of polar opposites; she too exaggerated especially when she’s conning us, and he, intentionally under-stated for the same reason.

While many like to chirp the worn out phrase about how “if you don’t vote…don’t complain” I have my own slogan;

“If you voted and don’t like the way things are turning out….you have only yourself to blame”.

Tuesday, September 14, 2010

TEEN BANNED FROM US FOR LIFE OVER OBAMA EMAIL

Yahoo!7 September 14, 2010, 9:24 am
A British teenager has been banned from America for life for sending Barack Obama an abusive email.

Luke Angel was reprimanded by police on both sides of the Atlantic after firing off a drunken message to the White House calling the president a "pr**k".

The FBI intercepted the message and contacted police in the UK who went to see the 17-year-old at his home in Silsoe, Bedfordshire.

Luke, a student, is now on a list of people who are banned from visiting the US.

The teenager told the Bedfordshire On Sunday newspaper that he had sent the email after watching a TV programme about September 11.

When asked about the ban, Luke said he did not care.

"My parents aren't very happy about it," he said.

"The police who came round took my picture and told me I was banned from America forever."

Joanne Ferreira from the US Department of Homeland Security said there are about 60 reasons a person can be barred.

"We are prohibited from discussing specific cases," she said.

Friday, September 10, 2010

7 FACTS ABOUT BUILDING 7

7 Facts about Building 7

Building 7 was a 47-story skyscraper and was part of the World Trade Center complex. Built in 1984, it would have been the tallest high-rise in 33 states in the United States. It collapsed at 5:20 pm on September 11, 2001. It was not hit by an airplane and suffered minimal damage compared to other buildings much closer to the Twin Towers.

7 Facts about Building 7

1) If fire caused Building 7 to collapse, it would be the first ever fire-induced collapse of a steel-frame high-rise.

2) Building 7’s collapse was not mentioned in the 9/11 Commission Report.

3) According to a Zogby poll in 2006, 43% of Americans did not know about Building 7.

4) It took the federal government seven years to conduct an investigation and issue a report for Building 7.

5) 1,250 architects and engineers have signed a petition calling for a new investigation that would include a full inquiry into the possible use of explosives for the collapse of Building 7.

6) Numerous witnesses say the possibility of demolishing Building 7 was widely discussed by emergency personnel at the scene and advocated by the building’s owner.

7) Building 7 housed several intelligence and law enforcement agencies, and the NYC Office of Emergency Management’s Emergency Operations Center, more commonly known as “Giuliani’s Bunker”.

Building 7 — Before Collapse

Building 7 was as far from the towers as several other large buildings outside of the WTC complex. It was more than 300 feet from the nearest wall of the North Tower. Building 6 stood between the North Tower and Building 7 as seen in this map:

Building 7

Photos of Building 7 in normal conditions:

Building 7 WTC Building 7WTC Building 7

Building 7 — During Collapse

Building 7

For videos of the collapse, click here.

Building 7 — After Collapse

Aerial view of Building 7‘s after September 11th, 2001.

Building 7 Collapse

Building 7

What about World Trade Center Buildings 3, 4, 5 and 6?

In addition to the Twin Towers and Building 7, the World Trade Center complex included buildings 3, 4, 5, and 6. Compared to Building 7, all of these buildings were severely damaged, first by falling rubble from the tower collapses, then by fires that burned for hours. Although these buildings were in critical condition, none of them collapsed.

NEW BOOK BY DAVID RAY GRIFFIN: COGNITIVE INFILTRATION

Posted on 09 September 2010
In his new book “Cognitive Infiltration – An Obama Appointee’s Plan to Undermine the 9/11 Conspiracy Theory“, Dr. David Ray Griffin writes about former Chicago and Harvard law professor Cass Sunstein, who in 2009 was appointed by President Barack Obama to direct an important executive branch office.
In 2008 Sunstein co-authored an article entitled “Conspiracy Theories: Causes and Cures,” containing a plan for the government to prevent the spread of anti-government “conspiracy theories.” Arguing that such theories are believed only by groups suffering from “informational isolation,” he advocated the use of David Ray Griffin Cognitive Infiltrationanonymous government agents to stealthily infiltrate groups that pose alternative theories on historical events via “chat rooms, online social networks, or real-space groups and attempt to undermine” those groups with the aim of breaking them up. Download a PDF of the article here.
Noting that Sunstein’s proposal has evoked condemnations from across the political spectrum–not least because it, being similar to the FBI’s COINTELPRO of the 1960s, would be illegal–David Ray Griffin focuses on the fact that Sunstein’s primary target is the conspiracy theory advocated by the 9/11 Truth Movement. Examining Sunstein’s charge that this theory is both “harmful” and “demonstrably false,” Griffin uses both satire and overwhelming evidence to show that this twofold charge applies instead to what Sunstein calls “the true conspiracy theory” about 9/11-namely, the “theory that Al-Qaeda was responsible for 9/11.”
David Ray Griffin: Cognitive Infiltration — Reviews
“David Ray Griffin has written a devastating critique of Cass Sunstein’s major effort to situate all critics of the official 9/11 story in the garbage pail of ‘conspiracy theory.’ Bringing to bear his formidable philosophical and theological skills, Griffin brilliantly illuminates this cognitive/ political concern, demonstrating that the American people will never find out what really happened on that fateful day until we as citizens insist on considering all available evidence with a fresh and open mind.” —Richard Falk, professor emeritus, Princeton University
“In the United States today, the phrase `conspiracy theory’ functions as a sort of giant cudgel, used to scare us out of talking openly about a broad (and ever-growing) range of scandals that the powerful cannot afford to let the people comprehend. In this new book, David Ray Griffin takes devastating aim at that repressive tactic, exposing it for what it really is. All those who cherish democracy, and intellectual freedom, owe it to themselves to read this brave analysis—and owe its author their sincerest thanks.”
—Mark Crispin Miller, Professor of Culture and Communication, New York University
“Unrestrained and unchallenged combination of top level political power and academic intellectual arrogance can be a dangerous prelude to governmental censorship and potential criminalization of individuals who dare to challenge ‘official’ versions of various catastrophes and major events of a highly controversial nature. Dr. David Ray Griffin exposes and analyses this grave concern in an objective, scholarly dissection of a sociopolitical proposal set forth by Cass Sunstein in 2008. Readers of Cognitive Infiltration will be both shocked and enlightened by this well documented and brilliantly written book.”
—Cyril H. Wecht, M.D., J.D., past president, American Academy of Forensic Sciences, and past president, American College of Legal Medicine
http://world911truth.org/new-book-by-david-ray-griffin-cognitive-infiltration/

US SOLDIERS 'KILLED AFGHAN CIVILIANS FOR SPORT AND COLLECTED FINGERS AS TROPHIES'

Soldiers face charges over secret 'kill team' which allegedly murdered at random and collected fingers as trophies of war
Twelve American soldiers face charges over a secret "kill team" that allegedly blew up and shot Afghan civilians at random and collected their fingers as trophies.
Five of the soldiers are charged with murdering three Afghan men who were allegedly killed for sport in separate attacks this year. Seven others are accused of covering up the killings and assaulting a recruit who exposed the murders when he reported other abuses, including members of the unit smoking hashish stolen from civilians.
In one of the most serious accusations of war crimes to emerge from the Afghan conflict, the killings are alleged to have been carried out by members of a Stryker infantry brigade based in Kandahar province in southern Afghanistan.
According to investigators and legal documents, discussion of killing Afghan civilians began after the arrival of Staff Sergeant Calvin Gibbs at forward operating base Ramrod last November. Other soldiers told the army's criminal investigation command that Gibbs boasted of the things he got away with while serving in Iraq and said how easy it would be to "toss a grenade at someone and kill them".
One soldier said he believed Gibbs was "feeling out the platoon".
Investigators said Gibbs, 25, hatched a plan with another soldier, Jeremy Morlock, 22, and other members of the unit to form a "kill team". While on patrol over the following months they allegedly killed at least three Afghan civilians. According to the charge sheet, the first target was Gul Mudin, who was killed "by means of throwing a fragmentary grenade at him and shooting him with a rifle", when the patrol entered the village of La Mohammed Kalay in January.
Morlock and another soldier, Andrew Holmes, were on guard at the edge of a poppy field when Mudin emerged and stopped on the other side of a wall from the soldiers. Gibbs allegedly handed Morlock a grenade who armed it and dropped it over the wall next to the Afghan and dived for cover. Holmes, 19, then allegedly fired over the wall.
Later in the day, Morlock is alleged to have told Holmes that the killing was for fun and threatened him if he told anyone.
The second victim, Marach Agha, was shot and killed the following month. Gibbs is alleged to have shot him and placed a Kalashnikov next to the body to justify the killing. In May Mullah Adadhdad was killed after being shot and attacked with a grenade.
The Army Times reported that a least one of the soldiers collected the fingers of the victims as souvenirs and that some of them posed for photographs with the bodies.
Five soldiers – Gibbs, Morlock, Holmes, Michael Wagnon and Adam Winfield – are accused of murder and aggravated assault among other charges. All of the soldiers have denied the charges. They face the death penalty or life in prison if convicted.
The killings came to light in May after the army began investigating a brutal assault on a soldier who told superiors that members of his unit were smoking hashish. The Army Times reported that members of the unit regularly smoked the drug on duty and sometimes stole it from civilians.
The soldier, who was straight out of basic training and has not been named, said he witnessed the smoking of hashish and drinking of smuggled alcohol but initially did not report it out of loyalty to his comrades. But when he returned from an assignment at an army headquarters and discovered soldiers using the shipping container in which he was billeted to smoke hashish he reported it.
Two days later members of his platoon, including Gibbs and Morlock, accused him of "snitching", gave him a beating and told him to keep his mouth shut. The soldier reported the beating and threats to his officers and then told investigators what he knew of the "kill team".
Following the arrest of the original five accused in June, seven other soldiers were charged last month with attempting to cover up the killings and violent assault on the soldier who reported the smoking of hashish. The charges will be considered by a military grand jury later this month which will decide if there is enough evidence for a court martial. Army investigators say Morlock has admitted his involvement in the killings and given details about the role of others including Gibbs. But his lawyer, Michael Waddington, is seeking to have that confession suppressed because he says his client was interviewed while under the influence of prescription drugs taken for battlefield injuries and that he was also suffering from traumatic brain injury.
"Our position is that his statements were incoherent, and taken while he was under a cocktail of drugs that shouldn't have been mixed," Waddington told the Seattle Times.

Wednesday, September 8, 2010

IRAQI TREASURES RETURN, BUT QUESTIONS REMAIN

September 7, 2010 By STEVEN LEE MYERS
BAGHDAD — Iraq announced on Tuesday the return of hundreds of looted antiquities that had ended up in the United States, even as a senior official disclosed that 632 pieces repatriated last year and turned over to the office of Prime Minister Nuri Kamal al-Maliki were now unaccounted for.

The latest trove reflects not only a history dating from the world’s oldest civilizations but also a more recent and tortured history of war, looting and international smuggling that began under Saddam Hussein, accelerated after the American occupation and continues at archaeological sites to this day.

The returned items include a 4,400-year-old statue of King Entemena of Lagash looted from the National Museum here after the American invasion in 2003; an even older pair of gold earrings from Nimrud stolen in the 1990s and seized before an auction at Christie’s in New York last December; and 362 cuneiform clay tablets smuggled out of Iraq that were seized by the American authorities in 2001 and were being stored in the World Trade Center when it was destroyed.

There was also a more recent relic: a chrome-plated AK-47 with a pearl grip and an engraving of Mr. Hussein, taken by an American soldier as booty and displayed at Fort Lewis, Wash. Kitsch, certainly, but priceless in its own way.

While Iraqi officials celebrated the repatriation of what they called invaluable relics — “the return of Iraq’s heritage to our house,” as the state minister of tourism and antiquities, Qahtan al-Jibouri, put it — the fate of those previously returned raised questions about the country’s readiness to preserve and protect its own treasures.

Appearing at a ceremony displaying the artifacts at the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Iraq’s ambassador to the United States, Samir Sumaidaie, pointedly said a previous shipment of antiquities had been returned to Iraq last year aboard an American military aircraft authorized by Gen. David H. Petraeus, only to end up missing.

“They went to the prime minister’s office, and that was the last time they were seen,” said Mr. Sumaidaie, who has worked fervently with American law enforcement officials in recent years to track down loot that had found its way into the United States.

It was not immediately clear what happened, and Mr. Sumaidaie said he had tried and failed to find out. He did not directly accuse Mr. Maliki’s government of malfeasance, but he expressed frustration that the efforts to repatriate works of art and antiquities had resulted in such confusion and mystery.

Ali al-Mousawi, a government spokesman, demanded that the American government account for the artifacts since an American military aircraft delivered them. “We didn’t receive anything,” he said in a telephone interview.

Mr. Jibouri, one of Mr. Maliki’s advisers, said that if the relics were not somewhere in the prime minister’s custody, then they would probably be with the Ministry of Culture, which oversees the country’s museums. Its spokesman declined to comment.

Amira Edan, the director of the National Museum, said none of the objects had been returned to her collection, which is where, she said, they all belonged.

Mr. Jibouri said a committee would be formed to investigate.

Perhaps with this uncertainty in mind, Mr. Jibouri and Foreign Minister Hoshyar Zebari publicly signed documents transferring custody of the latest batch of artifacts — which arrived in Baghdad on Monday, packed in wooden crates, aboard a specially chartered aircraft — to the museum.

“The artifacts are what’s pushing us to build the present and future, so we deserve this great heritage,” Mr. Zebari said during the ceremony.

The United States has returned 1,046 antiquities since 2003, when looters ransacked buildings across Iraq, including its museums, according to the American Embassy here. For all the international outrage the looting stirred toward the United States and its allies, many of the items were smuggled out of the country before the invasion, often with the connivance of officials in Saddam Hussein’s government, according to archaeological officials here.

They have been tracked and seized by the F.B.I., the Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency, and other law enforcement agencies, often working on tips from experts and officials with the Iraqi Embassy in Washington, which stored many of them at its building on Massachusetts Avenue for safekeeping as Iraq remained engulfed in violence.

Only a handful of the items returned on Tuesday once belonged to the National Museum. The most prominent is the statue of King Entemena, the oldest known representation of a monarch from the ancient civilizations that once thrived in Mesopotamia.

Carved from black diorite, it is 30 inches tall and headless, and inscribed with cuneiform that says it was placed in a temple in Ur, in what is now southern Iraq, to please the god Enlil. It weighs 330 pounds but disappeared from the museum during the looting, only to be seized in a 2006 sting when someone in Syria tried to sell it to an art dealer in New York.

Another Sumerian sculpture, a bronze depicting a king named Shulgi, had been shipped by Federal Express from a London dealer to a collector in Connecticut, but was seized at Newark Liberty International Airport.

Many such pieces are items that Iraq never knew it had lost.

Iraq has 12,000 known archaeological sites where Sumerian, Akkadian, Babylonian and Persian cities — and later Islamic cities — once stood. Many are unprotected, and have been badly looted for years, especially during the bloodiest years of war in 2006 and 2007. A special police force created in 2008 has yet to fill its ranks, mired at its inception by the government’s bureaucracy and a lack of support for cultural preservation.

The National Museum, which officially reopened last year though many of its galleries remain closed and in disrepair, has recovered roughly half of 15,000 pieces that were looted from its collection.

All told, Iraqi officials say they have confiscated and returned to government property more than 30,000 antiquities and artworks since 2003, from inside and outside Iraq. The museum can hold only a fraction of those.

“We can make 15 museums like the one we had,” its deputy director, Muhsin Hassan Ali, said on Tuesday.

The ultimate fate of the Saddam Hussein AK-47 also remains unclear, though it too was signed over to the custody of the National Museum. “Some material belongs to the fourth millennium B.C.,” Ms. Edan, the museum’s director, said laughing, “and the new ones belong to Saddam’s Iraq.”

The assault rifle ended up at the headquarters of the Third Stryker Brigade of the Second Infantry Division. The Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency said it had been taken “legally via official Army channels with the intent of placing it in a military museum as a war trophy.” Agents confiscated it after Mr. Sumaidaie’s aides read about it in a local newspaper report.

A factory in Iraq once produced AK-47s, including some plated in gold and chrome, which Mr. Hussein distributed as gifts. At the time the rifle was recovered, a special agent of ICE in New York, Peter J. Smith, called it “a priceless symbol of Iraqi history.”

Stephen Farrell and Zaid Thaker contributed reporting.

CHINESE OFFICIALS CALL FOR LESS FRICTION WITH U.S.

September 8, 2010 By KEITH BRADSHER
HONG KONG — Top Chinese officials are calling for quiet discussions instead of open friction with the United States, after a summer marked by bilateral disagreements over the value of China’s currency, American military exercises off the Korean Peninsula and American efforts to resolve territorial disputes in the South China Sea.

State media showed Chinese President Hu Jintao on Wednesday meeting with Lawrence H. Summers, the director of the National Economic Council, and Thomas E. Donilon, the deputy national security adviser. American and Chinese officials have been trying to lay the groundwork for a state visit to the United States this winter by the Chinese president.

Wednesday’s meeting with Mr. Hu followed earlier talks this week in Beijing by the two American officials that were aimed not at fashioning new pacts, but at maintaining a dialogue that had been strained at times in recent months.

“Strategic trust is the basis of China-U.S. cooperation,” said Dai Bingguo, a Chinese state councilor who met with them, the official Xinhua news agency reported.

Prime Minister Wen Jiabao told the two Americans that China and the United States should not view themselves as rivals, according to the Chinese state news media.

Both countries have been seeking an agreement to resume contacts between the two countries’ militaries. China suspended military exchanges last winter to protest a White House decision to proceed with arms sales to Taiwan. Beijing officials regard Taiwan as a renegade province.

On Wednesday, the South China Morning Post, citing unnamed Chinese officials, reported that the two countries had agreed to negotiations for the resumption military exchanges.

But Chinese officials were quick to dash any hopes that a thaw in Chinese-American relations would lead to appreciation of China’s currency, the renminbi. After strengthening on Monday on the hope that the talks in Beijing might produce a breakthrough, the currency’s value retreated in offshore futures trading on Tuesday after Jiang Yu, a Foreign Ministry spokeswoman in Beijing, said, “Our exchange rate reform can’t be pressed ahead under external pressure.”

After keeping the renminbi tightly pegged to the dollar for nearly three years, China announced on June 19 that it would allow greater flexibility. But the renminbi has inched up less than 1 percent since then against the dollar, as China has continued to intervene heavily in currency markets to prevent a more rapid currency appreciation that could hurt the competitiveness of Chinese goods in overseas markets.

KARZAI FAMILY POLITICAL TIES SHIELDED BANK IN AFGHANISTAN

September 7, 2010
Karzai Family Political Ties Shielded Bank in Afghanistan
By ADAM B. ELLICK and DEXTER FILKINS

KABUL, Afghanistan — In early 2009, as President Hamid Karzai scanned the landscape for potential partners to run in his re-election bid, he was approached from an unusual corner: a bank.

The president’s brother, Mahmoud, and another Afghan businessman, Haseen Fahim, were shareholders in Kabul Bank, one of the freewheeling financial institutions that had sprung up over the past decade since the Taliban’s fall.

According to Afghan officials and businessmen in Kabul, Mahmoud Karzai and Mr. Fahim recommended Mr. Fahim’s brother, Gen. Muhammad Qasim Fahim, to become the president’s running mate.

President Karzai agreed, and in a stroke co-opted his ethnic Tajik opposition and placated an old political foe with a checkered record on human rights and corruption. After the deal, Kabul Bank poured millions into Mr. Karzai’s re-election campaign, Afghan officials said. Mahmoud Karzai and Haseen Fahim, drawing on Kabul Bank’s resources, were able to enrich their families aided by tens of millions of dollars in loans.

Now, Kabul Bank sits at the center of a financial crisis that has exposed the shadowy workings of the country’s business and political elite, and how such connections shielded the bank from scrutiny. The panic surrounding Kabul Bank is threatening to pull down the Afghan banking system and has drawn in the United States. And it is driving a wedge between the Fahims and the Karzais, the two Afghan political families that benefited most. Now, the financial-familial arrangement is teetering on the edge of collapse.

“The brothers orchestrated the political deal to serve their business interests,” said a prominent Afghan businessman in Kabul who, like virtually everyone interviewed for this article, spoke only on condition of anonymity. “Fahim became vice president, and the bank financed Karzai’s re-election.

“In Kabul, politics is all about money,” he said. “It’s the same thing.”

In an interview, Mahmoud Karzai confirmed that he and Haseen Fahim tried to persuade President Karzai and General Fahim to reunite as running mates, but that there were many other Afghans who did as well.

Mahmoud Karzai said his backing of General Fahim had nothing to do with the fact that he and the future vice president’s brother were business partners.

“Yes, I recommended him,” Mr. Karzai said of General Fahim. “He is a sober man, and he is very brave.”

Haseen Fahim, reached by telephone in Germany, where General Fahim is undergoing medical treatment, declined to comment for this article. A spokesman for President Karzai did not answer requests for comment.

The troubles surrounding Kabul Bank, which Afghan and American officials have been struggling to contain, threaten to strain the Karzai-Fahim alliance. As President Karzai considers measures to support Kabul Bank, and possibly use public funds to bail it out, he must consider the possibility that doing so will open him to accusations of political favoritism.

“There is pressure on Vice President Fahim to bail out the bank because he does not want to lose his brother’s investments,” said an Afghan political leader in Kabul who opposes President Karzai. “If the president does this, it’s proof that his government is corrupt.”

Muhammad Qasim Fahim — also known as Marshal Fahim — was an unlikely candidate to become President Karzai’s running mate in 2009. He was best known as one of the senior military commanders of Ahmed Shah Massoud, the legendary anti-Taliban commander who was killed by assassins from Al Qaeda in 2001. With Mr. Massoud’s death, General Fahim stepped to the fore.

As the Taliban were being routed from Kabul in 2001, General Fahim was chosen by a gathering of Afghan leaders in Bonn, Germany, to be President Karzai’s vice president and defense minister. But the relationship was tense at best, Afghan political leaders in Kabul say, because the two men were so different. President Karzai, an educated ethnic Pashtun, had virtually no military experience. General Fahim was a Tajik warlord with little formal schooling.

The two men also had a past. In the early 1990s, during the tumultuous years of the Afghan civil war, Hamid Karzai was arrested and detained by the Afghan intelligence service — then being run by General Fahim. Mr. Karzai was released, but only after a rocket struck the jail where he was being held.

General Fahim is also suspected of involvement in serious human rights violations during the 1990s, according to several advocacy groups. In particular, he was a key commander during the Ashfar massacre in 1992 in Kabul, when an estimated 800 ethnic Hazaras were killed and raped.

In 2004, as Hamid Karzai prepared to run for president, he dropped General Fahim from his ticket, at the urging of Western allies troubled by his past. General Fahim was devastated by the move, Afghan political figures say.

Over the next several years, during President Karzai’s first term, Kabul Bank emerged as one of the country’s principal private financial institutions, with Haseen Fahim as a major shareholder. Initially, Mahmoud Karzai, the president’s brother, had no stake in the bank.

That changed at least three years ago, when the bank’s leaders, including Haseen Fahim, decided to lend Mahmoud Karzai at least $5 million in order to enable him to take an ownership stake in the bank. In the interview, Mr. Karzai said he thought there was nothing unusual about being lent such a large sum of money by a bank to buy shares in that bank. He said it had nothing to do with the fact that his brother was the president.

“This is the case for everyone who is a partner in the bank,” he said.

Mr. Karzai said that his 500 shares of bank stock — equaling about 7 percent of all the company shares — had paid no dividends to date. All of the bank’s profits have stayed in the bank, he said.

Another Afghan political figure, speaking on condition of anonymity, said the bank’s directors gave Mahmoud Karzai shares in Kabul Bank to gain the protection of the president.

“In Afghanistan, you cannot become a successful business if you are not linked to the political caste,” said the Afghan political leader, who spoke on condition of anonymity. “The only way to get contracts and protection is to have support in the political system, and that is the reason why these two guys were able to get shares in Kabul Bank. They gave Mahmoud a loan of $5 million. That was political survivalism. They knew they needed a Karzai.”

Mahmoud Karzai has profited directly from his relationship with Kabul Bank. He and Haseen Fahim were part of a group of investors who borrowed $14 million from Kabul Bank to start Afghan Cement.

In the interview, Mr. Karzai confirmed this transaction.

In 2007, Mr. Karzai took out a loan from the bank to buy a villa on the exclusive island resort of Palm Jumeria in the United Arab Emirates for $1.9 million, according to a report in The National, a leading newspaper there. Eight months later, he sold the villa for $2.7 million, for a profit of $800,000.

In an interview, Mr. Karzai said he repaid the loan in full.

For his part, Haseen Fahim has taken out $92 million in loans for various projects, Afghan banking officials say. The officials say those loans have not been repaid.

In the interview, Mr. Karzai said that neither he nor Mr. Fahim had any say in where Kabul Bank invested. Those decisions, he said, were made exclusively by the bank’s two largest shareholders, Sherkhan Farnood and Khalilullah Frozi. According to Afghan bank regulators and American officials, the bank made risky investments, including ones in the Dubai real estate market that collapsed in 2008, as well as questionable loans that skirted collateral and deposit requirements. These troubles helped precipitate the recent collapse.

“We were silent partners,” Mr. Karzai said.

Mr. Farnood declined to comment, and Mr. Frozi could not be reached for comment.

A former Afghan official, who knows both Mahmoud Karzai and Haseen Fahim, said the two men began pushing General Fahim as a vice-presidential choice in meetings with the president.

“Mahmoud brought the message from Karzai to Fahim, and a couple of meetings took place,” the former Afghan official said. “In every meeting, Karzai said, ‘It was a big mistake, and I want to make it up to you.’ And these meetings were facilitated by the brothers.”

The former Afghan official said both men regarded it as important for the bank to secure a political ally in the presidential palace.

“The issue is how to protect the business,” the former Afghan official said. “And the two brothers cannot only have protection for their businesses, but they can flourish and they did flourish afterwards.”

According to Afghan officials, Kabul Bank’s dealings went astray sometime after that. The bank recently posted losses of at least $300 million, prompting officials at the Central Bank to remove Mr. Farnood and Mr. Frozi as its top executives. The assets of the bank’s major shareholders, including Mahmoud Karzai’s, have been frozen.

“From one side, Kabul Bank looked like a success story,” the former Afghan official said. “But you see deep flaws in it that were covered because of the political allies at the top.”

Adam B. Ellick reported from Kabul, and Dexter Filkins from Istanbul.

Tuesday, September 7, 2010

Anti-Counterfeit Deal Close to Being Signed for Illegal Downloads

By Stephen Jones
Epoch Times Staff

Created: Sep 5, 2010 Last Updated: Sep 5, 2010

DOWNLOAD: A picture taken on March 2009 in Paris shows the screen of a computer showing a web site of downloading contents. Internet users who illegally download movies or music could be slapped with tough penalties. (Caroline Ventezou/Getty Images )
Internet users who illegally download movies or music could be slapped with tough penalties, under an international agreement set to be approved this month.

Representatives from almost a dozen governments and authorities are expected to meet in Tokyo later this month to ratify the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement (ACTA).

Details of the agreement are still shrouded in mystery after the U.S. government blocked the release of the latest draft document that was hammered out during two years of negotiations.

Despite assurances from participant governments, the ACTA has already become a lightning rod for civil rights activists and developing countries around the world.

“In negotiating this agreement,” the newly-formed Internet Freedom Movement said in a recent statement, “the governments and power brokers of the world have chosen to ignore the voice of the people, opting instead to expand their authoritarian spheres of influence into the digital frontier.”

Despite its inception in the Bush administration, the ACTA has since been adopted by Obama, who has described it as a key plank in the government’s strategy against the global trade in counterfeit goods, valued at US$200 billion annually.

The potential signatories to the agreement—the United States, Japan, Canada, Australia, the E.U. and its 27 member states, New Zealand, South Korea, Switzerland, Singapore, Mexico, and Morocco—agreed in the last meeting in Washington on Aug. 20 to wrap up negotiations in late September.

U.S. officials have said that since ACTA does not require changes in U.S. law, it would not need to be approved by Congress prior to its implementation. However, the secrecy surrounding the negotiations has raised concerns over the content of the final agreement.

An early draft negotiating document that was leaked on the whistle-blowing website Wikileaks in 2007 indicated that authorities would crack down on peer-to-peer file sharing.

The document indicated that travelers could see their iPods or laptops being screened by border security at airports and face criminal charges if found with illegally downloaded films or music. In addition, it would require ISPs to monitor the communication of users, and cut off the Internet connection of serial copyright violators.

Those measures appear to have been watered down, in documents that have been subsequently leaked in 2008, 2009, and earlier this year.

In a joint statement in August, participating countries sought to allay fears over the content of the agreement, saying that it “will not oblige border authorities to search travelers' baggage or their personal electronic devices for infringing materials.” Despite that, the agreement is still likely to grant customs officials the authority to seize counterfeit goods without a court order in all the participating countries.

A further cause for concern raised by Indian officials is that the agreement could affect the free flow of goods—particularly in generic drugs. The country launched a WTO dispute against the E.U. earlier this year over seizures of generic drugs in transit to South America.
However in the August statement, the participatory countries said that the ACTA “will not hinder the cross-border transit of legitimate generic medicines.”

The level of confusion over the content of the agreement is a reflection of the efforts of governments in obscuring the detail of current negotiations.

In March last year, the U.S. government denied a Freedom of Information Act request into the text of the ACTA draft, declaring it a “property classified” national security secret. Unnamed sources told the EurActiv website that the U.S. government has influenced a clampdown on information about ACTA being released widely.

Members of the European Parliament (MEP), who will vote on the treaty later this year, have not been given the full negotiating text—although they have been regularly debriefed.

At a meeting in July this year, Swedish MEP and Swedish Pirate Party member Christian Engström said he was told he could not circulate the details of the briefing with his constituents.

“In a democracy, new laws should be made by the elected representatives after an open public debate,” he wrote on his blog. “They should not be negotiated behind closed doors by unelected officials at the commission, in an attempt to keep the citizens out of the process until it is too late.”

The document has reportedly been circulated to lobbyists for some of the biggest commercial interests.

The U.S. movie, music, and software industries claim that they lose more than $16 billion in sales every year to pirated products, sold, or distributed on the Internet. In a speech at the Export-Import Bank in March this year, President Obama said that his administration was going to “aggressively protect our intellectual property.” But details of the negotiations suggest already that the implementation new agreement could be fraught with confusion.

According to a recent report by Reuters, the E.U. is pushing for “geographical indicators” being added to the draft document—which would protect goods that are drawn from a particular location, such as Cognac or Champagne. However, business groups are concerned that goods such as Kraft Parmesan cheese could also be regarded as an illegal item.

Nefeterius McPherson, a spokeswoman for the U.S. Trade Representative's office, was quoted as saying that all of the current disputes are resolvable by the time the participants meet later this month in Tokyo.

Sunday, September 5, 2010

US 'POPCORN LUNG' SUFFERER COMPENSATED

AAP September 5, 2010, 9:09 am

A US factory worker suffering from a life-threatening disease known as "popcorn lung" is bracing for an appeal after a jury last month awarded him $US30.4 million ($A33.4 million) against a supplier of a chemical found in butter-flavoured microwave popcorn.

The verdict on August 13 was thought to be the largest award in the country to an individual in a lawsuit involving diacetyl, according to the man's lawyer, Ken McClain. Lawyers for the supplier, BASF, are appealing.

Gerardo Solis, 45, has worked for various popcorn and popcorn-flavouring plants in the Chicago area since 1987. Over time, Solis, a father of three, developed bronchiolitis obliterans, a rare respiratory disease that has destroyed 75 per cent of his lungs, leaving him with the minimum lung capacity a person needs to live. Fireworks displays or second-hand smoke can send Solis into brutal coughing fits, which can cause him to pass out.

Eventually, he'll need a lung transplant, his lawyer said.

"His pain suffering, the loss of life expectancy, these are quality-of-life issues that you can't always put a dollar amount on," McClain said. Solis declined to comment.

Initially, 15 companies and one trade organisation were named in the complaint filed in 2006. All companies but BASF settled out of court for an undisclosed amount.

"BASF disputed the claims and is disappointed with the jury verdict," Maureen Paukert, a spokeswoman for the company, wrote in an e-mail. "The company will appeal and is confident its position will be vindicated on appeal if not corrected before by the trial judge."

According to the lawsuit, BASF failed to warn Solis and his co-workers about, among other things, the health and safety hazards associated with diacetyl, failed to conduct adequate testing on the harmfulness of the chemical, and failed to advise workers to wear respirators and chemical suits. The result, the lawsuit alleged, was that Solis continues to suffer physical pain and emotional distress while losing his wage-earning capabilities.

McClain alleged that BASF was particularly culpable because it knew of diacetyl's harmful effects as far back as 1993 when its parent company, BASF AG, found the chemical damaged the lung tissue of rats in a laboratory experiment.

Paukert declined to comment on the alleged study.

Diacetyl is a naturally occurring compound that gives butter its flavour. Studies have shown that the heated vapours of the chemical diacetyl lead to a breakdown of the airway branches deep in the lungs. The lung scarring is irreversible and can be fatal.

In 2002 a National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health investigation of a popcorn plant in Jasper, Mo., found a direct link between former workers who developed "popcorn lung" and their exposure to the chemical.

California and the Federal Drug Administration are now considering banning the chemical, and the Occupational Safety and Health Administration is considering limiting the level of exposure workers can have to the chemical, although no new rules or laws have been enacted despite years of study.

Distributed by McClatchy-Tribune Information Services.

MAN SUES AFTER POLICE BEATING CAUGHTt ON TAPE

HANDBOOK SUGGESTS THAT DEVIATIONS FROM 'NORMALITY' ARE DISORDERS

By George F. Will

Sunday, February 28, 2010; A15

Peter De Vries, America's wittiest novelist, died 17 years ago, but his discernment of this country's cultural foibles still amazes. In a 1983 novel, he spotted the tendency of America's therapeutic culture to medicalize character flaws:

"Once terms like identity doubts and midlife crisis become current," De Vries wrote, "the reported cases of them increase by leaps and bounds." And: "Rapid-fire means of communication have brought psychic dilapidation within the reach of the most provincial backwaters, so that large metropolitan centers and educated circles need no longer consider it their exclusive property, nor preen themselves on their special malaises."

Life is about to imitate De Vries's literature, again. The fourth edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM), psychiatry's encyclopedia of supposed mental "disorders," is being revised. The 16 years since the last revision evidently were prolific in producing new afflictions. The revision may aggravate the confusion of moral categories.

Today's DSM defines "oppositional defiant disorder" as a pattern of "negativistic, defiant, disobedient and hostile behavior toward authority figures." Symptoms include "often loses temper," "often deliberately annoys people" or "is often touchy." DSM omits this symptom: "is a teenager."

This DSM defines as "personality disorders" attributes that once were considered character flaws. "Antisocial personality disorder" is "a pervasive pattern of disregard for . . . the rights of others . . . callous, cynical . . . an inflated and arrogant self-appraisal." "Histrionic personality disorder" is "excessive emotionality and attention-seeking." "Narcissistic personality disorder" involves "grandiosity, need for admiration . . . boastful and pretentious." And so on.

If every character blemish or emotional turbulence is a "disorder" akin to a physical disability, legal accommodations are mandatory. Under federal law, "disabilities" include any "mental impairment that substantially limits one or more major life activities"; "mental impairments" include "emotional or mental illness." So there might be a legal entitlement to be a jerk. (See above, "antisocial personality disorder.")

The revised DSM reportedly may include "binge eating disorder" and "hypersexual disorder" ("a great deal of time" devoted to "sexual fantasies and urges" and "planning for and engaging in sexual behavior"). Concerning children, there might be "temper dysregulation disorder with dysphoria."

This last categorization illustrates the serious stakes in the categorization of behaviors. Extremely irritable or aggressive children are frequently diagnosed as bipolar and treated with powerful antipsychotic drugs. This can be a damaging mistake if behavioral modification treatment can mitigate the problem.

Another danger is that childhood eccentricities, sometimes inextricable from creativity, might be labeled "disorders" to be "cured." If 7-year-old Mozart tried composing his concertos today, he might be diagnosed with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder and medicated into barren normality.

Furthermore, intellectual chaos can result from medicalizing the assessment of character. Today's therapeutic ethos, which celebrates curing and disparages judging, expresses the liberal disposition to assume that crime and other problematic behaviors reflect social or biological causation. While this absolves the individual of responsibility, it also strips the individual of personhood and moral dignity.

James Q. Wilson, America's preeminent social scientist, has noted how "abuse excuse" threatens the legal system and society's moral equilibrium. Writing in National Affairs quarterly ("The Future of Blame"), Wilson notes that genetics and neuroscience seem to suggest that self-control is more attenuated -- perhaps to the vanishing point -- than our legal and ethical traditions assume.

The part of the brain that stimulates anger and aggression is larger in men than in women, and the part that restrains anger is smaller in men than in women. "Men," Wilson writes, "by no choice of their own, are far more prone to violence and far less capable of self-restraint than women." That does not, however, absolve violent men of blame. As Wilson says, biology and environment interact. And the social environment includes moral assumptions, sometimes codified in law, concerning expectations about our duty to desire what we ought to desire.

It is scientifically sensible to say that all behavior is in some sense caused. But a society that thinks scientific determinism renders personal responsibility a chimera must consider it absurd not only to condemn depravity but also to praise nobility. Such moral derangement can flow from exaggerated notions of what science teaches, or can teach, about the biological and environmental roots of behavior.

Or -- revisers of the DSM, please note -- confusion can flow from the notion that normality is always obvious and normative, meaning preferable. And the notion that deviations from it should be considered "disorders" to be "cured" rather than stigmatized as offenses against valid moral norms.

georgewill@washpost.com

Saturday, August 28, 2010

PHILADELPHIA WANTS $300 BUSINESS LICENSE FROM BLOGGERS WHO MAKE NO MONEY

The city of Philadelphia is demanding money from bloggers who were honest enough to report the meagerest - $11, $50 - of revenue from ads or donations.

According to the law, any blogger who enables advertising is required to register as a business, pay for a license and pay taxes on their profits no matter how small, the Philadelphia City Paper reported last week.

Philadelphia requires a license for the privilege of doing business when there is "activity for profit," a tax attorney told the paper, even if the activity did not earn a profit the year before or may never turn a profit.

The license is $300 for a lifetime or $50 a year.

But the city only knows about the ads you're placing on your freely-hosted blog if you report that income on your taxes.

At least two small-time bloggers are being asked to pay the price for their honesty. Marilyn Bess earned $50 between a few articles on eHow.com and her Wordpress-hosted blog about green living. She got a letter from the city demanding she pay $300 for a license plus taxes on her profits.

Another blogger, Sean Barry, writes about music on his blog Circle of Fits, hosted on Blogspot. He earned $11 in profit over two years and also received a letter.

As Barry wrote on his blog Friday

I never expected Circle of Fits to "make money" or be deemed a "business"... I put ads on it as an experiment, and I don't ever expect anyone to click on them..I don't even know how to put the time in to learn how to control which ones are being presented.
Bloggers are just a subset of workers affected by this regressive tax. According to the city's strict rules, any freelancer based in the city qualifies as a business and needs to get the license.

We've heard of cities requiring licenses when things like food or building construction are involved. But blogging?

What are the rules for microbusinesses in your city?

http://web.feedables.com/story/6384276/Philadelphia-Wants-300-Business-License-From-Bloggers-Who-Make-No-Money

DEBATING PHILADELPHIA'S $300 'BLOG TAX'

WASHINGTON, DC – The city of Philadelphia is now requiring bloggers who sell ad space to register for a $300 "business privilege license" to continue working in the city. The move to bolster the city's finances--first reported by the Philadelphia City Paper--was greeted with deep skepticism. Here's a sampling of responses:
  • $300 Far Too High The city's rationale for demanding the tax is understandable, writes Technorati's Alex Priest. "The city's budget is screwed, everyone is in the red, tax revenue is down, yada, yada, yada." It's the amount of the tax he thinks is wrongheaded. Priest writes that a $300 licensing fee is"outrageous and inexplicable in almost any context," especially when applied to bloggers who "99.9% of the time, aren't making any money anyway."
  • Not as Unreasonable as it Looks The fact the city requires freelance writers to pay the same fee shows that bloggers aren't being singled out, contends FireDogLake. "Bloggers aren't being unfairly targeted," they write. Rather, "anyone conducting any form if financial transaction is being targeted."
  • How Angry Bloggers Should Respond New York Magazine's Nate Freeman suggests outraged Philly bloggers eschew ad services like Google AdSense as a way of protesting the fee. Sure, "the minimal profits that once came rolling in will dry up," a fact Freeman believes is outweighed by the "self-satisfaction of refusing to give the city that hard-earned blog revenue."
  • Will Affect Very Few Bloggers Mashable's Christina Warren puts the fee in context. "It isn’t like they are doing full-scale audits for every person in Philly who runs a blog with ads," Warren notes. The only people the crackdown will have a "real-world impact on" are amateur bloggers who "report their blogging income on their individual income tax return." So, in other words, very few people.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/atlantic/20100823/cm_atlantic/debatingphiladelphias300blogtax4793